The European Commission is reportedly poised to dilute its proposed carbon emission reduction targets for new vehicles by 2030, a move drawing sharp criticism from climate advocates and raising concerns regarding the EU’s commitment to its climate goals. According to sources within negotiation circles, cited by German business newspaper Handelsblatt, the current regulation, mandating a 55% reduction in vehicle emissions compared to 2021 levels, is set to become less stringent in its annual targets. This follows a similar adjustment already made for the 2025 targets.
A key element of the proposed shift involves the introduction of “supercredits” for automakers producing more affordable electric vehicles. This system, originating in Brussels, would allow companies to offset their overall carbon footprint, effectively reducing the immediate pressure for substantial emission cuts. Notably, this incentive is unlikely to benefit German automakers, who currently lack a significant portfolio of budget-friendly electric vehicle models.
Perhaps most controversially, the plans now allow for the continued sale of plug-in hybrid vehicles and range extenders beyond 2035. Previously, the ambition was to effectively ban the sale of new combustion engine vehicles through progressively tightening emission limits, culminating in a zero-emission standard. The current proposal reportedly lowers that target to a 90% reduction instead of a complete elimination.
These adjustments, part of the broader “Fit-for-55” package, represent a significant departure from the EU’s revised pathway towards limiting climate change to just above two degrees Celsius. Prior to this shift, the bloc was on a trajectory leading to over four degrees of global warming.
Critics argue that these changes undermine the EU’s credibility as a global leader in climate action. The International Court of Justice’s recent ruling, emphasizing states’ obligations under international law to limit emissions in line with the 1.5-degree target – with potential legal repercussions for non-compliance – casts a long shadow over these policy revisions. The move is being viewed by many as a capitulation to industry lobbying and a strategic retreat from the EU’s legally binding climate commitments, with potentially far-reaching consequences for the fight against climate change. The shift leaves open serious questions regarding whether the EU will be able to meet the ambitious goals outlined in the European Green Deal.