The German Green Party leader, Franziska Brantner, has sharply criticized the federal government’s compromise on mandatory military registration and fitness assessments, labeling it as fundamentally lacking in ambition. While acknowledging the move as a necessary step towards establishing a database of potentially deployable individuals, Brantner argues the current framework fails to adequately prepare Germany for potential security threats.
“It’s positive that registration and fitness evaluations are finally being implemented, providing a foundation for identifying those willing and able to serve” Brantner stated, “However, the government’s approach is demonstrably insufficient.
Brantner’s primary concern centers on the age range included in the plan, which currently focuses on 18-19 year olds. She insists that such a limited scope neglects a vast pool of potential expertise vital for a modern defense strategy. “In a crisis, it will not be enough to simply register those in their late teens” she argued, advocating for a system capable of identifying and potentially engaging individuals with specialized skills, citing examples like drone experts and experienced chefs.
Beyond the age range, Brantner expressed reservations about the process’s perceived disregard for the perspectives of younger generations. “It’s a recurring pattern – decisions being made over the heads of young people, especially when a robust and attractive voluntary military service hasn’t been prioritized”. The Green Party leader believes a strengthened voluntary service program is a prerequisite for widespread public acceptance and active participation.
The coalition government’s consideration of a lottery system to select individuals for a potential “citizen’s defense” (Bedarfswehrpflicht) has further drawn Brantner’s ire. She warns that such a mechanism risks exacerbating confusion, as those selected retain the right to conscientious objection. “The question of what happens to these individuals remains unanswered” she pointed out, highlighting a critical gap in the proposed framework.
Ultimately, Brantner’s critique underscores a broader concern regarding the Bundeswehr’s ability to attract and retain the personnel necessary to ensure Germany’s defense capabilities align with contemporary security challenges. She contends that the current legislative compromises, particularly the limitations on age and the uncertain applicability of a lottery system, ultimately fall short and fail to adequately address the nation’s evolving security landscape.



