Facing mounting pressure to reduce the backlog of asylum rejections and alleviate strain on local municipalities, German politicians from the Christian Democratic Union (CDU) and Christian Social Union (CSU) are advocating for the introduction of a repatriation bonus, modeled after a similar program in Denmark. The proposal, presented as a means to encourage voluntary returns to individuals’ home countries, has quickly drawn both support and criticism within the political landscape.
Alexander Throm, CDU/CSU’s spokesperson for interior policy, underscored the coalition’s commitment to a “return offensive” outlined in the governing agreement, emphasizing that voluntary returns are preferable and economically more viable than forced deportations. Echoing this perspective, Jürgen Hardt, CSU’s foreign policy spokesperson, explicitly cited the Danish model – which offers several thousand euros to individuals choosing to return – as a potential template for Germany.
“The Danish model can serve as a benchmark for Germany” Hardt stated, arguing that bolstered incentives for voluntary repatriation can complement efforts to increase deportations. He further suggested that those returning home to contribute to the economic reconstruction of their nations, particularly Syria, should be assisted in forging a new beginning, thereby easing the financial burdens on German communities.
While enthusiasm for the concept exists, the specific proposed financial incentives are subject to debate. Stephan Mayer, a CSU parliamentarian specializing in interior affairs, suggested an initial repatriation bonus of €1,000 per person. Mayer cautioned that the amount must remain modest to avoid inadvertently creating a new influx of individuals seeking to exploit the program for financial gain.
The proposal has already sparked controversy, with critics questioning the ethical implications of financially incentivizing departures from a country offering refuge. Concerns are being raised that the scheme could be perceived as transactional, potentially damaging Germany’s image as a humanitarian nation. Furthermore, human rights organizations have voiced apprehension regarding the potential for coercion, arguing that those facing genuine vulnerability might feel pressured into accepting the bonus, even if it compromises their safety and future well-being. The long-term effectiveness of the program is also being questioned, with some analysts suggesting that the relatively small financial incentive might only attract those who were already considering return, failing to significantly impact the overall deportation backlog.