The German Federal Minister of Health, Nina Warken (CDU), has responded cautiously to media reports suggesting a potential elimination of Pflegegrad 1, the lowest level of care classification within the German long-term care system. Speaking to RTL and ntv broadcasters on Sunday, Minister Warken stated that the government would not abruptly remove existing benefits from citizens. However, she refrained from categorically ruling out such a change.
Acknowledging the long-term care system as a significant achievement, Warken emphasized the necessity for adjustments to ensure its sustainability and fairness across generations. She referred to the Care Commission, established in the summer, which is currently assessing the financial inflows and outflows of the care insurance system to develop reform proposals. “Reform of the care insurance system is urgently needed” she said, noting a growing public recognition of the need for change.
Minister Warken assured that individuals requiring assistance would continue to receive support, but indicated that system realignment and modernization would inevitably involve modifications. While the current Pflegegrade system serves as a valuable assessment tool, she suggested a focus on more targeted and needs-based assistance. The Commission is expected to present initial proposals in mid-October, including a review of the current Pflegegrade structure.
The Left Party has sharply criticized reports suggesting the government is considering abolishing Pflegegrad 1. Ines Schwerdtner, the party’s leader, described the potential move as an “attack” on individuals with limited resources. She highlighted that approximately 860,000 people currently rely on the minimum level of support afforded by Pflegegrad 1. Schwerdtner condemned the potential change as a “slap in the face” to those contributing to the care and health insurance systems for years.
The Left party proposed an alternative solution, advocating for mandatory contributions to a joint care insurance system from public servants, elected officials and high-income earners, arguing that the government is avoiding measures to address the financial strain lower-income individuals face.