A dispute has arisen between German Green Party politician Omid Nouripour and Bavarian Minister President and CSU leader Markus Söder, centering on accusations of ‘car hostility’ directed towards the Green Party.
In a five-page letter, Nouripour, acting as a member of the German Bundestag, rebuffed Söder’s assertion that the Green Party is inherently opposed to automobiles. The letter, reported by “Spiegel”, addresses concerns regarding the German automotive industry’s performance, a sector Söder recently blamed, in part, on the Green Party’s policies. Söder had stated in a recent interview that an anti-car stance poses a significant challenge to the industrial sector, especially given the industry’s substantial supply chain network and its continued importance to the German economy.
Nouripour’s letter emphasizes a shared commitment to the wellbeing of the German automotive industry, highlighting its “overwhelming significance” for the national economy. While acknowledging agreement on this fundamental point, Nouripour noted a divergence in perspectives regarding the causes and potential solutions to the current challenges. He expressed hope for collaborative efforts to benefit the nation.
The exchange follows Söder’s criticism of the European Union’s planned ban on new gasoline-powered vehicles beginning in 2035. Nouripour reminded Söder of his previous, contrasting positions on phasing out combustion engines, pointing out shifts in timing. He cautioned against repeating past policy errors during a critical period for the industry.
Acknowledging comments from Volkswagen CEO Oliver Blume regarding the feasibility of achieving the restrictive 2035 deadline, Nouripour echoed sentiments expressed by Cem Özdemir, a leading candidate for the Green Party in Baden-Württemberg, suggesting that the exact year is secondary to the commitment to a defined path. Nouripour advocated for achievable flexibility alongside the necessary clarity and infrastructure to support the growth of electric mobility, rather than hindering its advancement. He concluded by expressing his eagerness for a pragmatic approach that balances adaptability and clear direction.