The Saxon state premier, Michael Kretschmer of the CDU party, is escalating criticism of the European Union’s ambitious climate targets, arguing they risk accelerating deindustrialization and necessitate a fundamental reassessment. In an interview with n-tv, Kretschmer cautioned that the accelerated timelines for emissions reductions are unrealistic and economically unsustainable, potentially jeopardizing crucial industries within Germany and beyond.
Kretschmer’s core argument revolves around the current EU framework, which aims to reduce CO2 emissions by 90% by 2040 compared to 1990 levels. He contends this aggressive target severely restricts the flexibility needed across vital sectors like housing, industry and energy, essentially forcing a rapid and potentially damaging transition. He specifically questioned whether a reduction of 80% by 2050, rather than the current 100% target, would offer a more pragmatic and cost-effective pathway.
Beyond the overall reduction targets, Kretschmer flagged concerns regarding the EU’s carbon pricing mechanisms. He asserted the current carbon tax system is flawed and requires immediate review, particularly concerning its impact on investment decisions. He emphasized a need for “adjustment” suggesting a more moderate approach within the existing framework. While reaffirming his commitment to climate protection and the overarching goal of achieving climate neutrality by 2050, he stressed that energy must not become an “expensive and scarce commodity.
The premier’s critique extended to the German federal government’s proposed industrial electricity levy. Kretschmer raised concerns about the levy’s viability, questioning how it can function effectively when network costs significantly exceed the proposed 5-cent rate. He framed the current system as requiring ongoing, unsustainable subsidies.
Finally, Kretschmer dismissed any immediate consideration of resuming Russian gas imports, signaling a continued reliance on alternative energy sources and underscoring the broader political implications of Germany’s energy security strategy within the EU context. His pronouncements are likely to fuel a debate within the CDU and across the EU about the balance between environmental ambition and economic stability and the potential consequences of overly rigid climate policies.