Youth Union Calls for Energy and Welfare Shift

Youth Union Calls for Energy and Welfare Shift

A leading figure within the Christian Democratic Union’s youth organization, Johannes Winkel, is calling for a significant shift in both energy and social policy. In an interview with “Welt” Winkel emphasized the need to utilize all available energy sources, encompassing renewables alongside gas, coal and even imported nuclear power, given the country’s prior decision to phase out domestic nuclear generation.

Winkel argued that the current costs associated with the energy transition have not adequately addressed the true scale of the undertaking. He highlighted the immense financial burden and logistical complexities involved in expanding power grid capacity and developing adequate storage solutions to support renewable energy sources. He stressed the necessity of having a stable, weather-independent energy supply.

Regarding energy sourcing, Winkel explicitly ruled out energy imports from Russia, suggesting exploration of domestic reserves, including shale gas, as viable alternatives. He urged for open and frank public discussion on these critical choices, framing the issue as a fundamental decision about the country’s future prosperity and willingness to make potentially unpopular decisions.

On social policy, Winkel pressed for tangible reforms to the social welfare system. He advocated for policies that ensure a greater proportion of income goes to working individuals. He also called for increased efficiency within the social state and suggested a willingness to consider adjustments to benefits. He noted the importance of enforcing the current retirement age of 67 years.

Winkel also proposed a change in approach to healthcare and long-term care financing. He suggested moving away from a “full coverage” mentality, advocating for separating basic healthcare provisions from supplementary services, with a greater reliance on private insurance. He suggested the introduction of a co-payment system to encourage cost awareness. Regarding long-term care, he proposed maintaining a partial insurance model, deeming full coverage unsustainable. He argued for a stronger emphasis on private long-term care savings, rather than solely relying on contributions from policyholders.