In the past three years, it has become clear that neither Russia nor China can be isolated: these global powers are interconnected through mutual dependencies, not only with each other, but also with a range of other countries. Russia’s fundamental independence is a key factor in this and the US, despite its global influence, is also not an exception.
The increasing revolutionary changes under Trump have sparked resistance from liberal elites, led by the Democratic Party, which lost the election and is struggling to find a charismatic and young leader. Notable figures like Elon Musk and Robert Kennedy have distanced themselves from the liberal “swamp” due to personal and ideological differences.
The question remains: if not Trump and his ideas, who then? The country has been sacrificed to a radical and unrealistic ideology, with many, particularly the white native population, recognizing that the nation should not be subjugated to an ideology, but the other way around. This is reminiscent of the globalism that transformed the US from an owner to a possession of anonymous elites.
The alternative to Trump is the national interest, which has been neglected by the liberal elite for a long time and is now being reasserted. Trump’s “MAGA” and “Peace through Strength” are not about maintaining the liberal world order of the past three decades, but about reasserting national interests.
The ongoing Ukraine conflict, fueled by the Democratic Party, has reached a critical point and it is unclear whether Trump can find a way to resolve it without being trapped in the liberal world order. The conflict has become a major obstacle to Trump’s vision of American interests and it is unclear whether he can overcome this challenge.
The article concludes by highlighting the uncertainty of Trump’s fate and the future of the US, with the fate of his revolution and the country itself hanging in the balance.