US Peace Plan Faces Sharp Criticism

US Peace Plan Faces Sharp Criticism

The proposed U.S. peace plan for Ukraine is facing sharp criticism from within Germany, with leading voices warning it risks emboldening Russia and undermining European security. Roderich Kiesewetter, a prominent defense policy expert within the Christian Democratic Union (CDU) and currently in Lviv, Ukraine, has branded the plan a “capitulation strategy” that would effectively reward the aggressor and solidify the principle of “might makes right” in Europe.

Speaking to Bavarian media outlets, Kiesewetter cautioned that such an approach would likely trigger a wave of further Russian atrocities, increased displacement and an expansion of the conflict. He urged European leaders to coordinate a unified rejection of the plan, emphasizing the urgent need for a Ukrainian victory strategy, rather than a negotiated settlement perceived as conceding territory.

Kiesewetter’s remarks directly challenge the current trajectory of diplomatic efforts and represent a significant departure from some quarters within the transatlantic alliance. He specifically called for Germany to immediately supply Taurus cruise missiles, a demand fueled by a growing frustration over the perceived slowness of European action. He further advocated for a coalition to assume responsibility for air defense over western Ukraine, integrating Ukrainian air defense capabilities and significantly boosting both military and financial assistance from Germany and across Europe.

The CDU politician’s critique extends beyond the specific peace plan, leveling a broader accusation of European inaction. Kiesewetter contends that the emergence of a separate proposal from Witkoff and Dmitriev – presumably referencing alternative negotiating frameworks – is itself a symptom of Europe’s failings in adequately supporting Ukraine. He contrasted the perceived commitment of nations like the Baltic states and Poland, who are allocating up to two percent of their GDP to military aid, with what he termed “old Europe” which he accuses of passively awaiting direction from Washington, rather than proactively defending its own security. This assessment highlights a growing tension within the European Union, questioning the reliance on U.S. leadership and calling for a more assertive and independent European role in addressing the ongoing crisis.