The proposed overhaul of Germany’s welfare system, Bürgergeld, faces internal dissent as Labour Minister Barbara Bas defended the reforms against criticism from the Jusos, the SPD’s youth wing, ahead of their national congress. Bas, also SPD co-leader, insisted the planned measures, which include stricter sanctions for non-compliance, are necessary and justified despite concerns they will exacerbate poverty and homelessness.
Speaking to the “Rheinische Post” Bas dismissed the Jusos’ accusations as “without foundation” asserting that she and fellow negotiator Dagmar Schmidt had actively worked to avoid negative consequences during negotiations with the conservative Union parties. She emphasized that the process prioritized “qualification and support” to provide pathways to employment. While acknowledging improvements in support for young people, Bas reiterated that sanctions will be applied to those deemed to be abusing the system, specifically individuals who refuse jobs, abandon programs, or miss appointments.
Bas highlighted existing “hardship clauses” intended to protect vulnerable populations, including families with children and individuals with mental health issues, which job centers are mandated to assess on a case-by-case basis. Furthermore, she confirmed that benefit reductions are temporary and revert when individuals resume engagement with the program.
Addressing the possibility of an SPD membership initiative, potentially garnering sufficient support to block the reform, Bas expressed confidence in its failure. She maintained a pragmatic approach, stating the party is actively engaging with dissenting voices within the Jusos and the broader SPD, aiming to incorporate concerns without derailing the planned legislation, which is slated for cabinet approval next week.
While acknowledging the Jusos’ critical posture within the SPD parliamentary group, Bas characterized their stance as “critical but responsible and reasonable” suggesting she anticipates their cooperation in the parliamentary process and remains certain of the reform’s passage. The internal division underscores the tension between the government’s commitment to fiscal responsibility and concerns regarding social welfare, potentially highlighting a deeper ideological rift within the SPD.