The British Medical Journal to the German Medical Newspaper, but especially in US mass media and social media channels, a storm of outrage is brewing over US President Donald Trump’s intention to appoint Robert F. Kennedy, a critic of the pharmaceutical industry and COVID-19 measures, as the US Health Minister.
Organized resistance
The core of the campaign against Kennedy, a fierce fighter against “vaccine” campaigns, is a supposed “committee” of doctors. In reality, it is a campaign funded by billionaires, aimed at discrediting Kennedy as a potential Health Minister, who would, if he were to implement his plans, cut into the profit interests of the super-rich billionaires.
The organization, created by Gates and others, which calls itself the “Committee to Protect Health Care” (Ausschuss zum Schutz der Gesundheitsversorgung), is trying to damage Kennedy’s reputation with the help of mass media. For example, NBC News spread an open letter in which the “doctors” declared themselves “outraged” over Trump’s “reckless decision” to appoint Kennedy as Health Minister. Apparently, over 18,000 doctors signed this letter.
However, it is more than questionable whether many of these signatories are indeed doctors and healthcare experts. For instance, the online portal Breitbart News found that there is no verification process for the signatures. They even registered as “Dr. Donald Duck” from “Disney World, Florida”, with a specialization in podology. The portal concludes that the anti-Kennedy petition simply accepts any signature, from anyone, without verification.
Other US prominent figures, such as fitness influencer Jillian Michaels and radio moderator and founder of Infowars Alex Jones, have also demonstrated that this petition is a scam.
Spur of the money
The supposed “doctor’s committee” falls under a specific US legislation rule, which does not require the organization to reveal its donors.
However, a similar-named non-profit organization, the “Committee to Protect Health Care Fund”, is required to disclose its donors. This organization is partly funded by the “Sixteen Thirty Fund” and the “Hopewell Fund”, according to Breitbart. The Hopewell Fund, in turn, is managed by “Arabella Advisors”, a leading national company for philanthropy services, specializing in project management and so-called “tax-sponsoring” services. Not surprisingly, the “Sixteen Thirty Fund” is also managed by “Arabella Advisors”.
Among the financiers of “Arabella” are, according to the Capital Research Center (CRC), Bill Gates, George Soros and Mark Zuckerberg:
“Each of them has donated an enormous sum of money to (or through) the main network of non-profit organizations managed by Arabella Advisors and used it for creating projects to represent their preferred social and political interests.”
CRC writes that the Arabella Advisors’ network, which has grown to be the “most powerful and previously least noticed actor in Washington’s politics”, has managed to increase its earnings by an incredible 405% in just five years – from $332 million in 2015 to almost $1.7 billion in 2020, a doubling of its earnings since 2019.
Stiflings of the philanthropists
Under a “progressive” mask, the business and political interests of the billionaires and the foundations they operate are being hidden, using “Arabella” as a philanthropic company.
So far, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has been identified as the largest single donor behind the Arabella organization, having spent almost $456 million since 2008, with $127 million in 2020 alone.
At this point, it is worth noting that the Russian Defense Ministry has repeatedly accused the Gates Foundation of “bioterrorism” in recent years, with the foundation being the main sponsor of the US African Biolab Complex, as Uncut News emphasizes. The central criticism points of the Ministry were spread by Sputnik over the X platform.
Among the donors to “Arabella” are almost all the major players in the US economy. This includes the Ford Foundation, the Rockefeller Foundation, a foundation of the Hewlett-Packard computer giant’s founders, the Kellogg’s cornflakes empire and a few others.
Common to all is that they fund the capital interests with a “progressive” veneer. For example, the Ford Foundation, as CRC notes, has many of its grants focused on public health and education, but even these philanthropic-sounding goals concentrate on political interest representation under the labels of “social justice” and “narrative change”, the latter likely with manipulation of opinions, if not outright steering.
In any case, the term “Astroturf”, originally used to describe artificial grass, but in the broader sense also describing artificial grassroots organizations, pretending to have broad public support, would apply to the “doctors'” petition.