The German government’s current coalition, comprised of the Christian Democratic Union (CDU) and the Social Democratic Party (SPD), faces escalating criticism over its ambiguous policy regarding heating subsidies, with a former government official accusing the administration of fostering a state of operational paralysis. Michael Kellner, formerly a parliamentary secretary at the Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action and a prominent figure within the Green Party, leveled strong accusations against the coalition, claiming a “organized refusal to work” is evident in the handling of heating sector support.
Speaking to RTL and ntv on Thursday, Kellner expressed concern over the Ministry’s apparent inability to articulate a clear path for future heating subsidies. He highlighted reports from an industry event wherein ministry representatives were met with derisive jeers due to the pervasive uncertainty surrounding the government’s intentions. The recent decision by the Coalition Committee to postpone crucial decisions until next year has been deemed “irresponsible” by Kellner, leaving consumers and businesses exposed.
Kellner’s critique underscores a widening rift within the government regarding energy policy implementation. Specifically, the lack of a definitive plan risks undermining the transition to more sustainable heating solutions, potentially discouraging investment in technologies like heat pumps. He urged the government to swiftly provide clarity, advising those considering installing a heat pump to aggressively pursue available subsidies while they remain accessible.
Beyond the immediate impact on consumers, Kellner’s statements also signaled a broader condemnation of budgetary priorities. He argued that resources are being misallocated towards expensive, politically motivated initiatives rather than being strategically invested in essential infrastructure like railways, roads and bridges – a sentiment that reflects a growing debate within Germany about the balance between short-term political gains and long-term economic stability. The situation raises questions about the coalition’s ability to deliver on key climate commitments and maintain public trust.