The proposal by Bundestag President Julia Klöckner (CDU) to introduce a ban on the purchase of sexual services, modeled after the “Nordic model” has been cautiously welcomed by the women’s rights organization Solwodi. Maria Decker, chairwoman of Solwodi, expressed support, stating that the move represents a “significant step towards better protection for women”. The Nordic model, which penalizes buyers rather than sellers of sexual services, is framed as a potential shift away from Germany’s existing, more liberal approach to prostitution.
However, Decker harbors doubts regarding the likelihood of the ruling coalition adopting this course of action. She suggests that the government is likely to avoid a further divisive issue, citing a lack of consensus – even within the CDU – and substantial disagreements between the CDU and SPD, creating an environment where conflict avoidance is prioritized.
Decker used the opportunity to call for a fundamental reevaluation of Germany’s prostitution policy. She argues that the previous attempts to normalize prostitution through liberal regulations have proven to be misguided, leading to Germany becoming a focal point for sex tourism and perpetuating precarious living conditions for many individuals involved. The existing framework, she contends, has failed to address the underlying issues.
Central to Decker’s vision is the incorporation of comprehensive exit programs, a key component of the Nordic model. She emphasizes that these programs, while requiring significant investment, are a worthwhile investment in societal well-being.
The Nordic model remains contentious. Concerns persist among numerous women’s rights organizations that penalizing buyers could inadvertently drive prostitution further underground, potentially endangering sex workers and hindering efforts to improve their protection. Empirical evidence regarding the effectiveness of the model in other countries remains inconclusive, adding another layer of complexity to the debate over its potential implementation in Germany. The potential ramifications for vulnerable individuals and the broader societal impact necessitate careful consideration and further investigation.