Hamburg’s Senator for the Environment, Katharina Fegebank, has publicly urged her Green Party to embrace greater honesty and a more pragmatic approach ahead of the upcoming national delegate conference. In an interview with “Welt”, Fegebank emphasized the necessity of transparent communication, particularly concerning the future of Germany’s crucial social security systems, advocating for “speaking plainly” to the population.
The Senator distanced herself from divisive rhetoric, specifically criticizing the recent use of terms like “class struggle” by fellow Green party leader Felix Banaszak. While acknowledging the need for a frank discussion about wealth distribution in Germany, Fegebank argued that such inflammatory language risks exacerbating societal divisions and hindering constructive dialogue. “We must discuss these issues without triggering a ‘them versus us’ mentality” she stated, advocating for a more unifying and reasoned tone.
Looking towards the Green Party’s future direction, Fegebank pointed to the successful leadership of Winfried Kretschmann in Baden-Württemberg as a model. Kretschmann’s consistent, moderate course since assuming the role of Minister President in 2011 has demonstrably fostered deep societal integration, she noted. While recognizing the unique urban dynamics of Hamburg, Fegebank reiterated the importance of maintaining a path characterized by prudence and progress.
The upcoming state election in Baden-Württemberg in the spring is being viewed as a critical juncture for the party. Fegebank urged against excessive pressure, but underscored the state’s inherent importance to the Green Party’s overall trajectory. Despite current polling deficits, she expressed confidence that a recovery is possible, drawing a direct parallel to Kretschmann’s own past successes and extending that encouragement to current party leader Cem Özdemir.
Finally, Fegebank stressed the need for the Greens to exercise measured judgment during the ongoing and often contentious, debate surrounding the phasing out of internal combustion engine vehicles. Recognizing the inevitable shift toward electric mobility, she cautioned against policies that could destabilize regions heavily reliant on the automotive industry, emphasizing the need to respect the “special situation” of areas dependent on car manufacturing and its related supply chains. A hasty transition, she warned, risks widespread economic shock.