The German Interior Minister, Alexander Dobrindt of the CSU, has staunchly defended the government’s handling of Afghan nationals stranded in Pakistan, many of whom were initially promised entry to Germany under previous administrations. Dobrindt asserted that the majority of these individuals possess legally binding admission commitments which the current government intends to uphold, with a significant number already en route to Germany.
According to Dobrindt, approximately 2,000 individuals were awaiting entry into Germany in Pakistan when he assumed office, having received pledges through various prior refugee programs. However, he clarified that the government is not obligated to accept all of them, estimating around 600 individuals lack legally enforceable guarantees. He stated this group has been informed accordingly.
The situation has drawn considerable criticism, with over 200 organizations and prominent figures, including broadcaster Jan Böhmermann and actresses Iris Berben and Collien Fernandes, publicly condemning what they describe as “shameful maneuvering” by the government. These concerns stem from the inconsistency in the application of admission policies and the apparent U-turn on initial promises made to vulnerable individuals.
A recent charter flight carrying 160 individuals from the legacy federal admission program arrived in Germany on Tuesday, highlighting the ongoing complexities of the situation. As of now, 76 individuals in the local staff procedure and 465 others under the former “traffic light coalition’s” federal admission program remain awaiting visas.
Critics argue that the government’s selective enforcement of commitments undermines the principles of humanitarian duty and creates a climate of uncertainty for asylum seekers. The delayed processing and the failure to provide clear timelines have fueled discontent within both advocacy groups and the broader public. The government maintains that enhanced security checks are necessary, but the perceived lack of transparency surrounding these procedures continues to be a source of friction. The current stance raises fundamental questions about Germany’s commitment to international obligations and the potential damage to its reputation as a safe haven for those fleeing persecution.