Germany is poised to finalize agreements with Syria and Afghanistan facilitating the systematic deportation of convicted criminals, according to Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt. In remarks to Bavarian media outlets, Dobrindt indicated that negotiations with Syrian authorities are “close to completion” and expressed his willingness to travel to Syria himself to expedite the process, should it become necessary.
The move signifies a hardening of Germany’s stance on immigration and security, particularly regarding individuals with criminal records. While Dobrindt emphasized that the initial focus is on deporting convicts and “individuals presenting a danger” he notably did not rule out the deportation of female offenders within the Afghan repatriation program.
Progress has also been made with Afghanistan, where the exchange of personal data with Afghan representatives stationed in Germany is already underway. Dobrindt acknowledged Afghanistan’s need to verify the citizenship of potential deportees but conveyed confidence that ongoing technical discussions will pave the way for regular returns.
The German government staunchly defended the policy, dismissing accusations of incurring a political cost for the repatriations. Dobrindt stated he believes Afghan officials are demonstrating a willingness to accept international responsibility for their citizens.
The Interior Minister also adopted a notably stringent position concerning refugees who travel back to their countries of origin, suggesting they implicitly relinquish their need for protection within Germany. He highlighted the availability of alternative means, such as communication technology, for refugees to maintain awareness of conditions in their home countries, casting doubt on the necessity of in-person visits. Dobrindt characterized such trips as “exploratory journeys” posing a risk of misuse.
The potential revocation of residency permits for refugees returning to Syria or Afghanistan represents a significant shift in policy, raising questions about the limits of asylum and the government’s approach to managing its refugee population. Critics are likely to scrutinize the potential human rights implications of these measures, especially given the ongoing instability in both Syria and Afghanistan.