The Christian Democratic Union (CDU) and its Bavarian sister party, the Christian Social Union (CSU), are pushing for a swift resumption of deportations to Syria, a move that has ignited debate over the legality, morality and political expediency of returning individuals to a nation still grappling with the aftermath of prolonged conflict. Alexander Throm, the CDU/CSU parliamentary group’s domestic policy spokesman, has explicitly stated that repatriation to Syria is a “highest priority” for both parties, citing the recent arrest of a 22-year-old suspect allegedly planning a terrorist attack in Berlin as justification.
Throm’s remarks directly link the potential deportations to national security concerns, effectively framing returning individuals – particularly those unemployed and deemed unintegrated – as potential threats. The call echoes the terms of the current coalition agreement, which mandates a return to deportations, notwithstanding ongoing concerns regarding the Assad regime and the potential for human rights abuses. While acknowledging that the civil war and Assad’s rule are considered “ended” by the CDU/CSU, the argument neglects the deeply fractured social and political landscape within Syria and the persistent risk of persecution faced by various demographics.
The rationale presented leans heavily on the principle of temporary protection, suggesting that individuals should return once safety is assured in their country of origin. This view, however, ignores the complexities of Syria’s recovery, the ongoing presence of regional and international actors and the potential for arbitrary detention and mistreatment upon return.
This hardline stance has drawn criticism, even within the governing coalition. Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul had previously voiced skepticism about the feasibility and safety of deportations given the widespread destruction and instability that continues to plague Syria. His concerns highlight a significant division within the government regarding the responsible execution of repatriation policies and the potential for exacerbating humanitarian concerns.
The push for increased deportations also raises questions about the legal and ethical obligations of Germany, particularly concerning the potential for refoulement – the return of individuals to a country where they face a well-founded fear of persecution. While the policy is presented as a response to public demand and national security considerations, critics argue that it risks prioritizing political expediency over the fundamental rights and safety of vulnerable individuals. The debate underscores the ongoing tension between Germany’s commitment to international humanitarian law and its perceived obligations to maintain public order and address concerns over integration.