A growing sentiment of opposition is taking hold across Germany regarding the European Union’s planned ban on new combustion engine vehicles from 2035. A recent survey, conducted by Infratest Dimap for the ARD-Deutschlandtrend, reveals that 67% of German voters now believe the policy is misguided, a 5-percentage-point increase since January. The shift signals a brewing political challenge to the EU’s climate agenda, particularly as discussions regarding the regulation are currently being re-evaluated at the European level.
The initial decision to phase out new diesel and gasoline vehicles was ratified by EU member states in 2023. However, its unpopularity highlights a potential disconnect between EU-level policy-making and public opinion. The survey indicates widespread resistance across demographic lines. While support exists, albeit diminishing, even among younger voters (18-34 years, with 34% in favor), a majority within this age group also expresses concerns. Men (72% opposed) consistently demonstrate a stronger aversion to the ban than women (62%), reflecting broader anxieties about economic and personal freedom.
Political affiliations are demonstrably linked to attitudes on the issue, revealing fault lines within the German electorate. Overwhelmingly, supporters of the far-right Alternative für Deutschland (AfD – 94% opposed) and the center-right Christian Democratic Union (CDU – 75% opposed) voice strong criticism of the policy. Even within the Social Democratic Party (SPD), the governing party, internal debate is evident, with 54% expressing opposition and only 39% supporting the ban. Conversely, solid backing comes from supporters of the Green Party (77% in favor) and the Left Party (61% in favor), further polarizing the political landscape.
The mounting public skepticism places considerable pressure on the German government and EU policymakers. While upholding the EU’s commitment to climate action remains a priority, the survey suggests a need for more nuanced discussions regarding the feasibility, fairness and societal impact of such sweeping regulatory changes. The resurgence of this debate raises questions about the efficacy of top-down policy implementations and whether a more collaborative approach, incorporating public concerns, is necessary to achieve sustainable environmental goals.