Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul has addressed recent internal criticism, acknowledging a misstep while defending his approach to international diplomacy. In an interview with the Frankfurter Allgemeine Sonntagszeitung (FAS), Wadephul emphasized the importance of maintaining dialogue with global counterparts, irrespective of differing perspectives. He asserted that his position necessitates the ability to engage with all foreign ministers worldwide.
Acknowledging that his communication style has sometimes differed from that of Chancellor Friedrich Merz regarding the recent attacks involving Israel and the United States against Iran, Wadephul stressed the alignment of their objectives, stating that they maintain close and confidential coordination. Previously, Chancellor Merz had commented on Israel’s role, remarks that garnered support within the Christian Democratic Union (CDU). Wadephul suggested a need for the CDU to revisit this approach, highlighting that the role of Foreign Minister requires a commitment to ongoing dialogue.
Addressing criticism stemming from his own party, particularly concerning previous remarks regarding Israel, Wadephul conceded that the term “forced solidarity” was ill-chosen and would not be used again. However, he defended his critical assessment of Israel’s actions in the Gaza Strip, underlining the need to acknowledge the realities on the ground and the severity of the humanitarian situation. He particularly urged parties with a “C” in their name-presumably referencing Christian democratic parties broadly- to avoid overlooking the catastrophic humanitarian crisis.
Wadephul also reiterated his early advocacy for a new 5% defense spending target. He explained that his priority was to demonstrate Germany’s willingness to assume necessary responsibility to assembled NATO allies. This initiative ultimately succeeded, with the NATO summit subsequently adopting the 5% target, a decision Wadephul attributes to Germany’s commitment to security. He announced Germany’s adherence to the goal during an informal meeting of NATO foreign ministers in Turkey, marking a significant moment in the alliance’s direction and referencing a plan for the distribution of funds between weaponry and related infrastructure proposed by NATO Secretary General Rutte.