Chancellor Friedrich Merz of the Christian Democratic Union (CDU) has underscored Croatia’s crucial role in the ongoing negotiations surrounding the European Union’s planned expansion, highlighting its strategic positioning and historical ties to the wider Balkan region. Speaking after a meeting with Croatian Prime Minister Andrej Plenković at the Chancellery on Wednesday, Merz lauded Croatia’s proactive engagement in championing regional interests.
The remarks signal a deliberate shift in emphasis within the EU’s enlargement debate, with the CDU leader positioning Croatia as a pivotal connector and potential stabilizing force. While acknowledging the necessity of rigorous reforms and adherence to accession criteria for all candidate countries, Merz stressed the importance of a tangible connection between achieved reforms and progress within the accession process – a point that has drawn criticism from circles arguing for a more accelerated timeline.
The discussion, centered on bilateral cooperation and the upcoming European Council meeting in December, also encompassed critical foreign policy and security concerns. Notably, Merz specifically addressed Montenegro, widely considered the frontrunner in the accession process, advocating for the immediate commencement of negotiations on an accession treaty. This assertive call has invited scrutiny, with some analysts questioning whether pushing Montenegro forward prematurely could compromise the integrity of the broader accession process and risks undermining the perceived meritocratic approach.
The CDU’s championing of Croatia’s role also implicitly acknowledges internal divisions within the EU regarding enlargement policy. While the commission has expressed reservations about the pace of reform in several candidate nations, Merz’s statements appear to be an attempt to build momentum and navigate potential roadblocks in the enlargement strategy, aligning with a desire to demonstrate the EU’s commitment to regional stability and influence amidst growing geopolitical challenges. The focus on Montenegro, in particular, raises questions about the political considerations underlying the prioritization of certain candidates and the potential for overlooking deeper structural challenges within the accession process.