A growing faction within the Christian Democratic Union (CDU) is advocating for a significant shift in strategy regarding the Alternative for Germany (AfD), sparking internal debate just ahead of a critical CDU executive committee meeting. Concerns are mounting that the current posture of universal opposition to the AfD risks triggering parliamentary gridlock and exacerbating feelings of political alienation, particularly in eastern Germany.
Former CDU General Secretary Peter Tauber, speaking to “Der Stern”, argues that the perception of a unified front against the AfD needs to be re-evaluated. He suggested the party should reconsider its rigid system of “red lines” potentially allowing for the acceptance of resolutions supported by AfD votes. Tauber voiced fears that an inability to forge consensus will lead to “parliamentary blockades” rendering effective governance increasingly difficult. He questioned how broadly acceptable majorities can be achieved in eastern regions, where some citizens are reportedly drawing parallels between the current political climate and the rigid political divisions of the former East Germany.
Tauber, who previously served under Angela Merkel, underscored that a revised approach towards the AfD is now “a matter of state policy”. He insists any significant change must be underpinned by a cross-party agreement explicitly designed to prevent accusations of opportunism whenever decisions are reached with the AfD’s support.
Andreas Rödder, Chairman of the CDU-aligned think tank Republik21, echoes this sentiment, criticizing the long-standing strategy of strict demarcation as counterproductive. “The higher the wall we build, the stronger the AfD becomes” Rödder told “Der Stern”. He advocated for a “conditional willingness to engage” across the perceived “firewall” suggesting any dialogue is contingent on the AfD adhering to defined boundaries and unequivocally distancing itself from extremist positions and figures. Rödder believes that if the AfD demonstrates a commitment to these principles, “it is worth attempting a dialogue and engaging in a rigorous, substantive debate.
The proposals represent a contentious development within the CDU, reflecting anxieties about the AfD’s continued gains and the potential consequences of entrenched political polarization. They also raise complex questions regarding the party’s commitment to its core values and the potential for normalizing a party viewed as increasingly radicalized by many within the mainstream political landscape.