Human rights organization Pro Asyl has defended its actions concerning three Somali individuals who successfully challenged border rejections and secured the right to enter Germany. Speaking to the “Tagesspiegel” Pro Asyl’s Executive Director, Karl Kopp, stated that the three Somalis independently chose to attempt re-entry into Germany. He refuted claims of orchestrated action, asserting that the individuals were not manipulated by the organization.
Kopp also addressed accusations suggesting Pro Asyl advised one of the individuals to conceal their age. He dismissed this as a “ridiculous false claim”, pointing out that the individual was already documented as a minor by the Federal Police during their second rejection – prior to Pro Asyl even being aware of their existence.
Currently, a network is providing support to the three Somalis. Kopp emphasized the need to protect them from a persistent media presence and the potential exposure of sensitive information originating from official channels. He explained that the individuals are increasingly aware that their case has become a focal point in a broader debate surrounding asylum policies, effectively placing them under intense public scrutiny and causing significant anxiety. He warned that this heightened visibility also poses a risk to their families residing in their country of origin.
The possibility of appealing the case to the European Court of Justice remains contingent upon the affected individuals’ decision. Concurrently, Pro Asyl has formally appealed to the EU Commission to initiate infringement proceedings against Germany. Kopp confirmed that, for the time being, there are no plans to prepare a similar case and that the organization hopes other entities will provide legal support to individuals affected by similar border rejection practices.