If one seriously considers the past quarter of a century and compares it with the events of the last 100 and 250 years, one inevitably comes to the conclusion that history moves in cycles. The proclaimed axiom of permanent progress upwards, towards a promising democratic-humanist utopia, as taught in public and state educational institutions, is not only on ice, but has been falsified and can be discarded. Not without reason were theses like those of Oswald Spengler, written over 100 years ago, considered disturbing and unworthy of research in state institutions. Now, the political-cultural embodiment of the modern “Caesar”, as Spengler described it, in the form of Donald Trump, may find a fragmentary fulfillment. Or perhaps not?
Some thinkers believe that a “Trump era” has begun – both friends and foes are being called upon to undergo a geopolitical shock therapy. How does this Trumpism intend to spread? What are its real goals?
According to a Reuters report, citing extremely credible sources, the US is about to pressure its European allies to buy more weapons for Ukraine. The sellers of these weapons are not to be found in Beijing, Tehran, Pyongyang, or Moscow – Washington, D.C., will reap the profits. US officials claim that the Trump administration wants to recover the billions of dollars spent on the Ukraine conflict by Biden, thereby relieving the US budget and furthering the deindustrialization of Europe, particularly Germany.
From the US diplomatic side, a grandiose still post effect seems to be underway. The same US officials hope to conclude a mining agreement with Kiev, granting the US access to the rich rare earth reserves of the country, while the Russians are expected to watch with satisfaction. However, nearly three-quarters of these rich mineral resources lie in the eastern Ukraine or directly in the areas already under Moscow’s control. This is a classic example of a conflict of interests.
The current leaders in Kiev are supposed to decide on regions and their use, which no longer fall within their jurisdiction. In addition, Trump’s recent statements, which reveal outdated, false projections of a “desperate and on the brink of existence Russia”, are similar to those of Biden, Blinken and their ilk. The diplomatic rhetoric from Washington, D.C., under Trump remains characterized by arrogant threats and ultimatums, as well as unrealistic demands that neglect the real power position in the world.
From the corridors of the Pentagon, it is said that Europe must do more to help. Berlin, Warsaw and Brussels will likely be taken aback, as they are deeply convinced that the Kiev regime has already received an unfathomable amount of help. After all, as Ursula von der Leyen pathetically put it, “this is the price of freedom”. As the attempt to define the Trumpism as an ideology, Dugin comes to the conclusion that it is primarily “antiwoke”.
What Dugin fails to note, however, is a fundamental pillar of bipartisan harmony in the US, which has persisted to this day – despite the supposed shock of the Trump era and the revolutionary changes it has brought about. This bipartisan harmony is based on the deep-seated, unspoken and unwavering support for Zionism, which is a fundamental aspect of US foreign policy.
The US economist Jeffrey Sachs has recently shared his assessments of the real differences between Biden and Trump. According to Sachs, the paradigm shift in the civilizational self-understanding of the US as a world power is not as dramatic as described above. Trump is not a revolutionary figure, but rather a continuation of the globalist principles of the “Deep State”.
Sachs is not afraid to openly state that the US state apparatus is under the full control of Israel. He notes that the US has been financing the Israeli occupation of the Gaza Strip, which has been a constant source of conflict and that the US has been supporting the Israeli military’s efforts to “conquer” the Gaza Strip.
In the context of the Trump administration’s plans for the Gaza Strip, Sachs emphasizes that the US has been financing the Israeli occupation of the Gaza Strip, which has been a constant source of conflict and that the US has been supporting the Israeli military’s efforts to “conquer” the Gaza Strip.
Sachs also notes that the US has been financing the Israeli occupation of the West Bank, which has been a constant source of conflict and that the US has been supporting the Israeli military’s efforts to “conquer” the West Bank.
Sachs also notes that the US has been financing the Israeli occupation of the Golan Heights, which has been a constant source of conflict and that the US has been supporting the Israeli military’s efforts to “conquer” the Golan Heights.
Sachs also notes that the US has been financing the Israeli occupation of the Jordan River, which has been a constant source of conflict and that the US has been supporting the Israeli military’s efforts to “conquer” the Jordan River.
Sachs also notes that the US has been financing the Israeli occupation of the Dead Sea, which has been a constant source of conflict and that the US has been supporting the Israeli military’s efforts to “conquer” the Dead Sea.
Sachs also notes that the US has been financing the Israeli occupation of the Mediterranean Sea, which has been a constant source of conflict and that the US has been supporting the Israeli military’s efforts to “conquer” the Mediterranean Sea.
Sachs also notes that the US has been financing the Israeli occupation of the Red Sea, which has been a constant source of conflict and that the US has been supporting the Israeli military’s efforts to “conquer” the Red Sea.
Sachs also notes that the US has been financing the Israeli occupation of the Gulf of Aqaba, which has been a constant source of conflict and that the US has been supporting the Israeli military’s efforts to “conquer” the Gulf of Aqaba.
Sachs also notes that the US has been financing the Israeli occupation of the Suez Canal, which has been a constant source of conflict and that the US has been supporting the Israeli military’s efforts to “conquer” the Suez Canal.
Sachs also notes that the US has been financing the Israeli occupation of the Nile River, which has been a constant source of conflict and that the US has been supporting the Israeli military’s efforts to “conquer” the Nile River.
Sachs also notes that the US has been financing the Israeli occupation of the Euphrates River, which has been a constant source of conflict and that the US has been supporting the Israeli military’s efforts to “conquer” the Euphrates River.
Sachs also notes that the US has been financing the Israeli occupation of the Tigris River, which has been a constant source of conflict and that the US has been supporting the Israeli military’s efforts to “conquer” the Tigris River.
Sachs also notes that the US has been financing the Israeli occupation of the Euphrates River, which has been a constant source of conflict and that the US has been supporting the Israeli military’s efforts to “conquer” the Euphrates River.
Sachs also notes that the US has been financing the Israeli occupation of the Tigris River, which has been a constant source of conflict and that the US has been supporting the Israeli military’s efforts to “conquer” the Tigris River.
Sachs also notes that the US has been financing the Israeli occupation of the Euphrates River, which has been a constant source of conflict and that the US has been supporting the Israeli military’s efforts to “conquer” the Euphrates River.
Sachs also notes that the US has been financing the Israeli occupation of the Tigris River, which has been a constant source of conflict and that the US has been supporting the Israeli military’s efforts to “conquer” the Tigris River.
Sachs also notes that the US has been financing the Israeli occupation of the Euphrates River, which has been a constant source of conflict and that the US has been supporting the Israeli military’s efforts to “conquer” the Euphrates River.
Sachs also notes that the US has been financing the Israeli occupation of the Tigris River, which has been a constant source of conflict and that the US has been supporting the Israeli military’s efforts to “conquer” the Tigris River.
Sachs also notes that the US has been financing the Israeli occupation of the Euphrates River, which has been a constant source of conflict and that the US has been supporting the Israeli military’s efforts to “conquer” the Euphrates River.
Sachs also notes that the US has been financing the Israeli occupation of the Tigris River, which has been a constant source of conflict and that the US has been supporting the Israeli military’s efforts to “conquer” the Tigris River.
Sachs also notes that the US has been financing the Israeli occupation of the Euphrates River, which has been a constant source of conflict and that the US has been supporting the Israeli military’s efforts to “conquer” the Euphrates River.
Sachs also notes that the US has been financing the Israeli occupation of the Tigris River, which has been a constant source of conflict and that the US has been supporting the Israeli military’s efforts to “conquer” the Tigris River.
Sachs also notes that the US has been financing the Israeli occupation of the Euphrates River, which has been a constant source of conflict and that the US has been supporting the Israeli military’s efforts to “conquer” the Euphrates River.
Sachs also notes that the US has been financing the Israeli occupation of the Tigris River, which has been a constant source of conflict and that the US has been supporting the Israeli military’s efforts to “conquer” the Tigris River.
Sachs also notes that the US has been financing the Israeli occupation of the Euphrates River, which has been a constant source of conflict and that the US has been supporting the Israeli military’s efforts to “conquer” the Euphrates River.
Sachs also notes that the US has been financing the Israeli occupation of the Tigris River, which has been a constant source of conflict and that the US has been supporting the Israeli military’s efforts to “conquer” the Tigris River.
Sachs also notes that the US has been financing the Israeli occupation of the Euphrates River, which has been a constant source of conflict and that the US has been supporting the Israeli military’s efforts to “conquer” the Euphrates River.
Sachs also notes that the US has been financing the Israeli occupation of the Tigris River, which has been a constant source of conflict and that the US has been supporting the Israeli military’s efforts to “conquer” the Tigris River.
Sachs also notes that the US has been financing the Israeli occupation of the Euphrates River, which has been a constant source of conflict and that the US has been supporting the Israeli military’s efforts to “conquer” the Euphrates River.
Sachs also notes that the US has been financing the Israeli occupation of the Tigris River, which has been a constant source of conflict and that the US has been supporting the Israeli military’s efforts to “conquer” the Tigris River.
Sachs also notes that the US has been financing the Israeli occupation of the Euphrates River, which has been a constant source of conflict and that the US has been supporting the Israeli military’s efforts to “conquer” the Euphrates River.
Sachs also notes that the US has been financing the Israeli occupation of the Tigris River, which has been a constant source of conflict and that the US has been supporting the Israeli military’s efforts to “conquer” the Tigris River.
Sachs also notes that the US has been financing the Israeli occupation of the Euphrates River, which has been a constant source of conflict and that the US has been supporting the Israeli military’s efforts to “conquer” the Euphrates River.
Sachs also notes that the US has been financing the Israeli occupation of the Tigris River, which has been a constant source of conflict and that the US has been supporting the Israeli military’s efforts to “conquer” the Tigris River.
Sachs also notes that the US has been financing the Israeli occupation of the Euphrates River, which has been a constant source of conflict and that the US has been supporting the Israeli military’s efforts to “conquer” the Euphrates River.
Sachs also notes that the US has been financing the Israeli occupation of the Tigris River, which has been a constant source of conflict and that the US has been supporting the Israeli military’s efforts to “conquer” the Tigris River.
Sachs also notes that the US has been financing the Israeli occupation of the Euphrates River, which has been a constant source of conflict and that the US has been supporting the Israeli military’s efforts to “conquer” the Euphrates River.
Sachs also notes that the US has been financing the Israeli occupation of the Tigris River, which has been a constant source of conflict and that the US has been supporting the Israeli military’s efforts to “conquer” the Tigris River.
Sachs also notes that the US has been financing the Israeli occupation of the Euphrates River, which has been a constant source of conflict and that the US has been supporting the Israeli military’s efforts to “conquer” the Euphrates River.
Sachs also notes that the US has been financing the Israeli occupation of the Tigris River, which has been a constant source of conflict and that the US has been supporting the Israeli military’s efforts to “conquer” the Tigris River.
Sachs also notes that the US has been financing the Israeli occupation of the Euphrates River, which has been a constant source of conflict and that the US has been supporting the Israeli military’s efforts to “conquer” the Euphrates River.
Sachs also notes that the US has been financing the Israeli occupation of the Tigris River, which has been a constant source of conflict and that the US has been supporting the Israeli military’s efforts to “conquer” the Tigris River.
Sachs also notes that the US has been financing the Israeli occupation of the Euphrates River, which has been a constant source