The Thuringian Office for the Protection of the Constitution has issued a stark assessment of the Alternative for Germany (AfD) party, alleging close ties to Russia and increasingly concerning links to elements within the US Republican sphere. Stephan Kramer, head of the state agency, revealed to “Handelsblatt” that the AfD maintains extensive connections with Russia, citing documented meetings between AfD parliamentarians and Russian government officials, alongside concerning travel to Russian-occupied territories including Crimea and the Donbas region.
Kramer highlighted a concerning alignment of narratives, noting that the AfD’s messaging frequently mirrors content disseminated by Russian state media. He characterized the party as a “relevant multiplier” for pro-Russian positions, raising serious questions about its independence and susceptibility to external influence. Reports suggesting potential financial support from Russia are also reportedly under scrutiny.
The assessment extends beyond Russian influence, identifying a growing alignment with networks connected to the American right-wing. Kramer pointed to the AfD’s integration into circles associated with former US President Donald Trump, citing meetings with conservative and ultraconservative think tanks such as the European chapter of CPAC in Hungary, alongside connections between individual AfD politicians and Christian nationalist groups and figures associated with the “alt-right.
Crucially, the report identifies individuals like Steve Bannon, former strategist to Donald Trump, as playing a significant role. Bannon’s engagement, described as “active consultation” underscores the extent to which foreign actors are attempting to shape the German political landscape. Furthermore, the report implicates Elon Musk, CEO of Tesla, alleging direct electoral campaign support for the AfD. United States Vice President J.D. Vance has also been identified as having intervened in the German federal election campaign, framing the AfD as a purportedly suppressed opposition force, a perspective sharply criticized by observers as a deliberate attempt at disinformation.
The Thuringian Office’s findings are likely to intensify scrutiny of the AfD’s funding sources, political messaging and overall alignment with foreign interests, posing a significant challenge to the party’s legitimacy and raising broader questions concerning the vulnerability of the German political system to external interference. The report will undoubtedly fuel debate within the German government and across the political spectrum regarding the necessary safeguards to protect the integrity of democratic processes.