The German Automobile Club (ADAC) is pressing for a significantly accelerated timeline for the driver’s license reform proposed by Federal Transport Minister Patrick Schnieder (CDU), raising concerns about potential delays and compromises amidst lobbying efforts. While Schnieder has outlined key changes aimed at streamlining, accelerating and reducing the cost of acquiring a driver’s license, the ADAC warns that the current projected implementation date of early 2027 is unacceptable and risks prolonging the existing crisis of lengthy wait times and escalating expenses for young drivers.
Gerhard Hillebrand, ADAC’s traffic president, told the “Neue Osnabrücker Zeitung” that a ratification within the first half of 2026 should be achievable. He emphasized the urgency, stating that the current situation places an untenable burden on prospective drivers. The ADAC’s push comes as Schnieder’s proposals face scrutiny, with fears arising that powerful lobbying groups, particularly driving schools, might dilute the intended reforms.
Hillebrand expressed hope that Schnieder would maintain a firm hand during the legislative process, resisting attempts to water down the proposals. The ADAC believes the current suggestions are “definitely acceptable” particularly regarding the reduction of theoretical test questions from over 1,200 to a more manageable 750, a move they maintain will adequately assess essential traffic knowledge. The ADAC also dismissed concerns raised by TÜV (technical inspection association) regarding the proposed changes as “overstated.
The ADAC supports the digitalization of theoretical instruction as a viable option, clarifying that it should not be mandatory. This digital flexibility, they argue, would allow driving schools to considerably reduce operational costs related to physical classroom space and provide students with greater control over their study schedules. While acknowledging the continuing need for in-person instruction in certain scenarios, such as accident simulation, the ADAC believes the organization of this component should be left to the discretion of driving schools.
Furthermore, the ADAC champions a reduction in the practical driving test duration to just 25 minutes, deeming it sufficient to accurately gauge a candidate’s competence. Hillebrand expressed confidence that a candidate’s suitability can be assessed within the first two minutes of the examination. This curtailment would significantly increase the number of practical tests that can be administered, directly addressing the current bottleneck contributing to delays and inflated costs. The ADAC also suggested the potential utilization of driving simulators to expedite and lower the cost of driver training.
The pressure from the ADAC highlights the inherent political tensions surrounding the reform, balancing the desire for accessibility and affordability with concerns about road safety and the economic interests of established driving school industries. The next few months will be crucial in determining whether Schnieder can deliver on his promises and appease the ADAC’s call for speed and integrity in this vital legislative overhaul.